Rajnandan Verma v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.23572 of 2019 ====================================================== Rajnandan Verma S/o Tulsi Verma Resident of Village Nauranga,P.S. Muffasil (Gaya), Dist.Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar,Patna 2.
The Principal Secretary, Department of Electric and Energy, Govt. of Bihar,Patna 3.
The District Magistrate, Gaya 4.
The Chief Engineer, Department of Electric, Magadh Range, Gaya 5.
The Superintending Engineer, Department of Electric,Gaya 6.
The Executive Engineer (Project) Department of Electric,Gaya ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Arvind Kumar, Adv.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Akhileshwar Singh, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 28-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.
This is an application for grant of the following reliefs:
"I. To direct the respondents the respondents to install the High Electric Poles for connecting through wire of Jani Bigha Fidder must be run through road side way.
Patna High Court CWJC No.23572 of 2019(2) dt.28-11-2019 2/2 II. To restrain the respondents who are ready to cross the high voltage electric wire over the residential house in Nauranga Bhusunda Village in spite of place available through the road side way. III. To direct the respondents to protect the life of villagers of Nauranga Bhusunda from the dangerous keeping high voltage in Electric wire which is passing over the village.
IV. Any other relief/reliefs may be granted in the interest of villagers of Nauranga Bhusunda, Manpur, Gaya."
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition reserving liberty to approach the authorities concerned for redressal of his grievances. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) K.C.Jha/- U