Patna High CourtCR. MISC./60687/2023allowed

Lorik Singh @ Lorik Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2023-09-18Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60687 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-85 Year-2023 Thana- FATUA District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

LORIK SINGH @ LORIK RAI S/O SIKANDAR SINGH @ SIKANDAR YADAV @ SIKANDAR RAI R/O VILLAGE- NARAINA, PS. FATUHA, DIST. PATNA 2.

SIKANDAR SINGH @ SIKANDAR YADAV @ SIKANDAR RAI S/O LATE JAI NARAIN SINGH R/O VILLAGE- NARAINA, PS. FATUHA, DIST. PATNA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rudra Deo For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nawal Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 18-09-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners have prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation against the petitioners along with others is of killing the daughter of the informant.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. They have committed no offence. Petitioner no. 1 is the brother-in-law and petitioner no. 2 is the father-in-law of the deceased. There is no any prior complaint

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60687 of 2023(2) dt.18-09-2023 2/2 regarding assaulting, harassment and torturing to the deceased against the petitioners. He submitted that the petitioners have no concern with mess and business of the deceased as well as her husband and also he lives separately from them. He further submitted that the sole responsibility of taking care of his wife (deceased) is upon her husband. Petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. They are languishing in judicial custody since 30.04.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below in connection with Fatua P.S. Case No. 85 of 2023.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U