Pawan Kumar Poddar v. The Union Of India And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20266 of 2010 ====================================================== Pawan Kumar Poddar aged About 52 Years S/O Shri Manohar Lal Poddar, a Handling Contractor of Navratan Bazar, Sasaram, Distt.-Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The Union Of India Through General Manager, E.C.Railway, Hazipur.
2. The Divisional Railway Manager, E.C.Railway, Munglsarai.
3. The Sr. Divisional Commercial Manager, E.C.Railway, Mugalsarai.
4. The Managing Director, Bihar State Warehousing Corp., First Floor, Mauryalok Complex, Patna-1.
.... .... Respondents ====================================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20105 of 2010 ====================================================== Kameshwar Singh, aged about 63 years, son of late Sri Raghunath Singh, a Handling Contractor of G.T. Gandhi Smarak, Sasaram, District Rohtas .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The Union Of India Through General Manager, E.C.Railway, Hazipur.
2. The Divisional Railway Manager, E.C.Railway, Munglsarai.
3. The Sr. Divisional Commercial Manager, E.C.Railway, Mugalsarai.
4. The Regional Director, Central Warehousing Corporation, 3rd Floor, Mauryalok Complex, Patna-1.
.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance:
(In CWJC No.20266 of 2010) For the Petitioner : Mr. Nagendra Upadhyay,Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. D.K.Sinha, Sr. Advocate Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Advocate Mr. Abhimanyu, Advocate (In CWJC No.20105 of 2010) For the Petitioner : Mr. Nagendra Upadhyay,Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. D.K.Sinha, Sr. Advocate Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Advocate Mr. Abhimanyu, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 17-09-2015 After some arguments learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners Mr. Nagendra Upadhyay seeks permission to withdraw these writ petitions with liberty to take recourse for redressal of their
Patna High Court CWJC No.20266 of 2010 (9) dt.17-09-2015 grievances before the appropriate forum, in accordance with law.
2. Permission is accorded. The writ petitions accordingly stand dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran U