Sama Parveen @ Parveen Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65136 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-132 Year-2022 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== SAMA PARVEEN @ PARVEEN SINGH W/O Sukhbir Singh R/O House No- 526, Street No- 2, Guru Tej Bahadur Nagar, Near Children Valley, Mundian Lalan, Ludhiana, Punjab, 141015 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vishal Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 03-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No. 132 of 2022, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8, 20 (b)(ii)(B) and 22 of N.D.P.S. Act.

As per allegation about 21.950 kg contraband (Ganja) was recovered from the petitioner.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that investigation in this case is complete and charge-sheet has already been submitted.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65136 of 2022(2) dt.03-01-2023 2/3 He further submits that the petitioner has been languishing in jail since 29.04.2022.

It has also been stated in paragraph no. 3 that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents.

It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the petition that the petitioner has not moved any petition earlier before this Court for grant of anticipatory or regular bail. However, the learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the petitioner for bail. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance, particularly the recovered commercial quantity of alleged contraband, I am not persuaded to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage.

The application stands rejected accordingly.

However, if the trial is not concluded within one year, the petitioner has liberty to renew her petition of prayer for bail.

The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects, if any, pointed out by the office within a period of one month and the Registry is directed to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65136 of 2022(2) dt.03-01-2023 3/3 issue the certified copy of this order only after removal of office objections.

(Jitendra Kumar, J) ramesh/- U T