Patna High CourtCWJC/5426/2016withdrawn

Indu Kumari And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-03-08Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran1 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.5426 of 2016 (2) dt.08-03-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5426 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Indu Kumari, Daughter of Late Ram Chandra Singh, Wife of Shri Awanish Kumar Resident of village + P.O. Mustafapur, P.S. Suryagarha, District - Lakhisarai.

2. Radha Sinha, Daughter of Ganauri Singh, Wife of Ram Naresh Singh Resident of village - Nahub, P.O. Rajgir, District - Nalanda.

3. Neelam Kumari, Daughter of Ram Lakhan Sharma, Wife of Gopal Prasad Resident of village- Karma, P.O. Punthar, P.S. Narhat, District - Nawada.

4. Sunita Kumari, Daughter of Devgan Prasad, Wife of Krishna Prasad Resident of village - Balchand Bigha, P.O. & P.S. Ven, District - Nalanda

5. Sarojani Kumari, Daughter of Bajrang Mahto, Wife of Late Ganesh Mandal Resident of village - Ratanpur, P.O. & P.S. Bariarpur, District - Munger.

6. Sushila Kumari, Daughter of Late Shrichand Prasad, Wife of Shrilalji Prasad resident of village & P.O. Prasdiha, P.S. Nagar Nausha, District - Nalanda. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Principal Secretary, Health Department, Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Health Services, Bihar, Patna.

4. The Civil Surgeon -Cum- Chief Medical Officer, Nalanda.

5. The Chairman, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Bihar Veterinary College, Patna.

6. The Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Bihar, P.O. Veterinary College, Patna 800014.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ajay, GA-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 08-03-2018 Counsel for the parties are present.

Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners informs that the authority concerned has given assurance to consider the grievance of the petitioners and thus for the present the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition to move again in case the decision would be otherwise. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty so prayed.

(Jyoti Saran, J) SKPathak/- U