Bharat Sah And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11709 of 2016 (2) dt.27-04-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 11709 of 2016 Arising out of P.S. Case No. -108 Year- 2014 Thana -RAXAUL District- EASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ===================================================

1. Bharat Sah son of Late Shankar Sah, resident of villageKaurihar Chow, P.S.- Raxaul, District- East Champaran.

2. Munnilal Sah, son of Puran Sah, resident of village- Laxmipur Laxumanwa, P.S.- Palanwa, District- East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s =================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Ram Shankar Das (Spl.PP) ================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 02.

27.04.2016 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the State.

The Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in Raxaul P.S. Case No. 108 of 2014 registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(i)(x) of the SC/ST (POA) Act pending before the Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, Raxaul, East Champaran. It has been submitted that it was on account of misconception that the Petitioners withdrew the application for anticipatory bail and, hence, they have filed fresh anticipatory bail.

Considering the nature of allegations against the Petitioners, I am not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to them. The prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected.

Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.) U T