Laxmi Das @ Laxman Das v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.54777 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -215 Year- 2017 Thana -NARPATGANJ District- ARRARIA ======================================================

1. Laxmi Das @ Laxman Das, son of Late Manrup Das, resident of VillageMathura West, P.S.- Narpatganj, District- Araria. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Madan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 15-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Narpatganj P.S. Case No. 215 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections-272, 273, 290 of the Indian Penal Code and 30(a) of Bihar Excise Act. It is alleged in the written report that two litres country made liquor has been recovered from the house of this petitioner and other two accused persons.

The seizure list with respect to this petitioner is available with the FIR which does not bear signature either of this petitioner or any of his family members.

In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner named above in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54777 of 2017 (2) dt.15-11-2017 2/2 bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with in Narpatganj P.S. Case No. 215 of 2017 to the satisfaction of Additional District & Sessions Judge-II, Araria subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T