Chitranjan @ Chitranjan Kumar @ Chitranjan Chandravanshi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58067 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-23 Year-2021 Thana- NARALI KALA KHURD DistrictAurangabad ====================================================== Chitranjan @ Chitranjan Kumar @ Chitranjan Chandravanshi Son of Awadhesh Chandravanshi Residence of Village- Sahu Khap, P.S- Narari Kala Khurd, Dist- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Mukul Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Suman Kumari Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 21-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner apprehend his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 354/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, one co-accused, namely, Amit Kumar is said to have molested the wife of the informant. It is further alleged that other accused persons assaulted the informant with lathi, danda and iron rod. It is also alleged that the other accused persons also assaulted the family members of the accused due to which his aunt suffered serious injury.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58067 of 2022(2) dt.21-12-2022 2/2 no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of the bail application. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. It is further submitted that after investigation the police has filed the final form against the petitioner. Court below has taken cognizance against the petitioner.

Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail application and submits that the petitioner is also involved in the present case and it is clear from the perusal of the F.I.R.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is hereby rejected.

This application is accordingly, dismissed.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Shahnawaz/- U T