Bhola Chaudhari @ Bhola Chauhan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59465 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-179 Year-2016 Thana- BUXAR COMPLAINT CASE DistrictBuxar ====================================================== Bhola Chaudhari @ Bhola Chauhan S/o Shri Balmiki Chaudhari R/o vill - Amaisi Dehra, P.S.- Kochas, District- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Lalsa Devi W/o Bhola Chaudhari @ Bhola Chauhan R/o vill - Amaisi Dehra, P.s.- Kochas, Distt.- Rohtas, Presently, D/o Bhoda Chauhan, R/o Pandeypatti, P.S.- Buxar (T), Distt.- Buxar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rabindra Kumar Mr.Dinkar Kumar Mr.Ajit Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 28-04-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the D. P. Act.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case was referred for mediation and the mediation was successful and the dispute has been resolved amicably. It is also submitted that in terms of the settlement as recorded by the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59465 of 2025(6) dt.28-04-2026 2/3 learned Mediator, the petitioner shall pay the amount within the time framed.

4. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party no.2 fairly submits that he is not opposing the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner for the present in terms of the compromise arrived at but then submits that if the petitioner does not adhere to the terms of agreement after obtaining anticipatory bail, then what will happen, on which the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner is aware of the consequences which would entail if the petitioner does not adhere to the terms of the agreement as recorded by the learned Mediator. It is further submitted that if petitioner does not fulfill the terms of the compromise as recorded by the learned Mediator, in that event, the anticipatory bail if granted to the petitioner shall be liable to be cancelled.

5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bailbonds in the sum of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor Court in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59465 of 2025(6) dt.28-04-2026 3/3 connection with Complaint Case No.179(C) of 2016, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

6. The application stands allowed.

7. It is made clear that opposite party no.2 shall be at liberty to file an application seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail if the petitioner does not adhere to the terms of the compromise as recorded by the learned Mediator.

8. At this stage, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party no.2 submits that even opposite party no.2 shall abide by the terms of the compromise. (Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T