← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/9976/2008disposed

Smt. Sundarpato Devi And ORS. v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-04-09The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9976 of 2008 ====================================================== Parmatma Sinha, (since deceased) son of Late Bhikhari Sinha, resident of village Samastpur, P.O. Gamharia, P.S. Masharak, District-Chapra. Following legal heirs and representatives were substituted vide order dated 03.11.2011.

1. Smt. Sunderpato Devi, W/o Late Parmatma Sinha, resident of village Samastpur, P.O. Gamharia, P.S. Masharak, District-Saran

2. Visheshwar Kumar Singh son of Late Parmatma Sinha, resident of village Samastpur, P.O. Gamharia, P.S. Masharak, District-Saran

3. Smt. Geeta Devi, daughter of Late Parmtma Sinha, resident of village Samastpur, P.O. Gamharia, P.S. Masharak, District-Saran

4. Ravish Kumar Singh son of Late Parmtma Sinha, resident of village Samastpur, P.O. Gamharia, P.S. Masharak, District-Saran

5. Prashant Kumar son of Late Parmtma Sinha, resident of village Samastpur, P.O. Gamharia, P.S. Masharak, District-Saran .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary Water Resources Department at Sinchai Bhawan, Patna.

2. The Accountant General, Bihar Beer Chand Patel Marg, Patna.

3. The Superintending Engineer, Kharagpur Water Resources Circle at P.O. Kharagpur, District-Munger.

4. The District Provident Fund Officer at P.O. & District-Munger. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nand Kishore Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vivekanand Kumar, Advocate Mr. L.P.K. Rajgrihar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 09-04-2015 The original petitioner retired from service as Executive Engineer on 31.07.2007. He filed this writ petition complaining that certain benefits, such as ACP and part of gratuity were not paid to him. He died during the pendency of the writ petition and his heirs and legal representatives were brought on record.

Patna High Court CWJC No.9976 of 2008 (10) dt.09-04-2015 2/2 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents.

It is brought to the notice of the Court that during the pendency of the writ petition, the benefit of ACP has been extended to the petitioners and as regards other benefits, sanctioned orders have been issued on 23.02.2015. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing that the respondents shall implement the sanction order dated 23.02.2015, within two months from today.

(L. Narasimha Reddy, CJ) Sunil/- U