Basanti Devi And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.58887 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -184 Year- 2017 Thana -MAKHDUMPUR District- JEHANABAD ======================================================

1. Basanti Devi, Wife of Badri Bind,

2. Munni Devi, Wife of Ramji Bind.

3. Rajia Devi, Wife of Ramautar Bind.

4. Bachchiya Devi, Wife of Rajaram Bind.

5. Mundar Devi, Wife of Chandeshwar Bind,

6. Daulti Devi, Wife of Jugal Bind.

7. Manju Devi, Wife of Arun Kumar Bind.

8. Fulmatia Devi, Wife of Ram Pravesh Bind.

9. Futkan Bind, Son of Late Bachchu Bind.

10. Vijay Bind, Son of Late Bachchu Bind.

11. Pramod Bind, son of Raj Ballam Bind.

12. Udal Bind, son of Ramji Bind.

13. Nandu Bind, son of Doman Bind,

14. Santosh Bind, son of Doman Bind, All resident of Village Saidpur Tola, Beldari, P.S.- Makhdumpur, District- Jehanabad (Bihar).

.... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Indu Shekhar Dwivedi, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Ashlam Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Makhdumpur P. S. Case No. 184 of 2017 registered under Sections 147, 148, 109 and 353 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that save and except the fact that the petitioners'

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.58887 of 2017 (2) dt.13-12-2017 2/2 presence was found at the place of occurrence, there is no other material to connect the petitioners with offence under section 353 of the Indian Penal Code. He submitted that from perusal of the FIR itself, it would be manifest that it was one Sanjeev Kumar @ Bande Yadav, who was instrumental in instigating people and causing road blockade.

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioners. Having regard to the nature of allegation, the petitioners named above are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- ( Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Jehanabad in Makhdumpur P. S. Case No. 184 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from today. (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.) Kanchan/- U T