Hari Nandan Roy v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70432 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-165 Year-2021 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul ====================================================== 1.

Hari Nandan Roy Son of Late Gumani Roy Resident of Village- Baruari Tola- Madhuban, Ward No. 12, P.S. and District- Supaul. 2.

Dhirendra Roy S/o Late Gumani Roy Resident of Village- Baruari TolaMadhuban, Ward No. 12, P.S. and District- Supaul. 3.

Rabiya Devi Wife of Dhirendra Roy Resident of Village- Baruari TolaMadhuban, Ward No. 12, P.S. and District- Supaul. 4.

Truphul Devi Wife of Hari Nandan Roy Resident of Village- Baruari TolaMadhuban, Ward No. 12, P.S. and District- Supaul. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amarnath Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 06-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 384, 379, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is alleged that F.I.R named accused persons including the petitioners assaulted the informant and his father for non-fulfillment of ransom demand of rupees

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70432 of 2021(3) dt.06-07-2022 2/3 five lakhs.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that in the background of some land dispute, the present accusation has been levelled against the petitioners. There is counter version of the occurrence also and petitioners' side also received injuries. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners and the specific accusation of making assault with dabiya is against Raju Kumar who is not petitioner before this Court. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

In the facts and circumstance of the case, let the petitioners, above named, except petitioner No. 2, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousands) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70432 of 2021(3) dt.06-07-2022 3/3 Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in connection with Supaul (Lokha OP) P.S. Case No. 165 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Shageer/- U T