← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./58986/2025bail granted

Ramdeo Prasad @ Ramdev Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-21Justice Smt. Soni Shrivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58986 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-455 Year-2024 Thana- SIRDALA District- Nawada ====================================================== Ramdeo Prasad @ Ramdev Prasad S/O Late Bundi Prasad Resident of Village- Chapri, P.S.- Sirdalla, District- Nawada, ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Man Mohan Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Shaan Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 21-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109, 74, 352 and 351(2) of the B.N.S.

3. The allegation in the First Information Report relates to the accused persons entering the house of the informant and assaulting him and his family members.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would be apparent from the First Information Report that the same has been lodged against 13 persons belonging to the same family and the specific allegation upon the petitioner is with regard to assaulting on the head of the informant by means of Khanti, however, the injury report has been annexed with the petition and the same is also available in the case diary which shows that the injury received by the informant is simple in nature caused by

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58986 of 2025(4) dt.21-01-2026 2/2 blunt object. It is submitted that there is case and counter case as both sides are gotiyas and the petitioner's side has received grievous injury and as a matter of fact, one person even died.

5. Learned APP for the State and the learned counsel for the informant have opposed the grant of anticipatory bail on the basis of allegations.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances and considering the nature of injuries attributable to the petitioner, coupled with the existence of case and counter case and injury is also on the side of the petitioner, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Sirdalla P.S. Case No. 455 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C/ Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023.

(Soni Shrivastava, J) anand/- U T