Pankaj Singh @ Pankaj Kumar Singh @ Kari Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64953 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-79 Year-2024 Thana- BARAUNI District- Begusarai ====================================================== Pankaj Singh @ Pankaj Kumar Singh @ Kari Singh son of Late Shankar Singh R/o - Bihat, Jagir Tola, P.S.- F.C.I., District - Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shashank Shekhar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anand Kishore Choudhary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 17-10-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 354(B), 379, 385, 386, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of two cases and the informant alleges that petitioner along with other accused persons intercepted her son and on the point of gun demanded extortion of Rs.1,00,000/- and when her son raised objection, the accused assaulted him by iron rod and disrobed him and thereafter tied his hand and made him roam in the village, on getting the information, when informant reached the place of occurrence, the accused outraged her modesty and also assaulted her son by
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64953 of 2024(2) dt.17-10-2024 2/3 an iron rod.
4. The learned counsel submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that the victim had taken a loan of Rs.10,000/- and when the petitioner demanded his money back, an altercation took place, in which both side assaulted each other and thereafter the instant false case came to be instituted. It is also submitted that from perusal of the injury report, it would manifest that the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature, which amply demonstrates that petitioner never had any intention of committing a serious occurrence.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Barauni P.S. Case No.79/2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64953 of 2024(2) dt.17-10-2024 3/3 Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T