Laxmi Kant Singh @ Bigan Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63184 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-228 Year-2024 Thana- HISUWA District- Nawada ====================================================== Laxmi Kant Singh @ Bigan Singh Son of Late Balmiki Singh R/o - Bajra, P.s - Hisua, District - Nawadah ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Arun Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Abhay Kumar Roy ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 25-09-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 337, 338, 307, 353, 171(C) and 188 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that the accused persons including the petitioner created obstruction in discharge of official duty, further when the administration was trying to pacify the accused persons not to create disturbance in the parliamentary election, the accused persons started pelting stones on account of which, Constables
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63184 of 2024(2) dt.25-09-2024 2/3 Manish and Raghubansh suffered injury, it is next alleged that the petitioner along with 16 accused persons were identified by the administration.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is also submitted that petitioner resides nearby the place of occurrence, as such, on hearing the ruckus, he had also gone to see what was happening when he came to be implicated. It is next submitted that there is no specific allegation of assault alleged against the petitioner, rather the allegation is general and omnibus in nature and the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature, as would manifest from Annexure-2 to the anticipatory bail application.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63184 of 2024(2) dt.25-09-2024 3/3 is pending/successor court in connection with Hisua P.S. Case No. 228 of 2024 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T