Arvind Kumar @ Arvind Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57268 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2025 Thana- PAKARIBARAW District- Nawada ====================================================== Arvind Kumar @ Arvind Yadav S/O Ramadhin Yadav, Resident of VillageBaliyari Bujurg, P.S.- Pakaribarawan, District- Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Man Mohan Kumar, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 21-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Pakaribarawan P.S. Case No.13 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) & 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, there is recovery of 40 liter country made liquor from Village Baliyari Bujurg and about 300 liter mahua mixture was destroyed at the said place.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot but he has been implicated in this case on the basis of disclosure made by local Chaukidar who has inimical term with

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57268 of 2025(2) dt.21-08-2025 2/2 the petitioner. Learned counsel submits that there is no proper compliance of Section 103 of BNSS in preparing the seizure list. He further submits that petitioner is in custody since 05.07.2025, having two criminal antecedents, in which, he is on bail and the charge sheet has already been submitted in this case. Learned counsel submits that there is no chance of absconding the petitioner or tampering with the evidence and he undertakes to cooperate in the investigation and trial.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Excise, Court-I, Nawada in connection with Pakaribarawan P.S. Case No.13 of 2025.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Ritik/- U T