Ramji Mukhiya v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.4121 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-62 Year-1993 Thana- JHANJHARPUR District- Madhubani ====================================================== Ramji Mukhiya, s/o late Jagat Mukhiya, r/v-Bariyarba, P.S.-Bheja, DistrictMadhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Manoj Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Nand Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 07-02-2019 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in S.T. No. 242/2011, arising out of Jhanjharpur P.S. Case No. 62/1993, instituted for offences under Section(s) 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code. This is a case of misuse of privilege of bail. Bail bond of petitioner was cancelled on 08.10.2012. Petitioner is in custody since 21.06.2018. This case has been registered for offences under Sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner has sufficiently been punished for the laches on his part.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4121 of 2019(3) dt.07-02-2019 2/2 bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in connection with S.T. No. 242/2011, arising out of Jhanjharpur P.S. Case No. 62/1993, subject to the conditions that (I) both the bailors shall be the close relative of the petitioner.
(II) Petitioner shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without valid reason will result in cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner and (III) if petitioner tamper with the evidence in the case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J) rakhi/- U T