Kedar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.9 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -192 Year- 2017 Thana -HASPURA District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== Kedar Yadav, son of late Sheoraj Singh, resident of village : Mehandipur, P.S. Haspura, District : Aurangabad.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bal Mukund Prasad Sinha, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 13-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Haspura P.S. Case No. 192 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 353, 307, 379, 354(A), 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution case is that while the informant who is Block Development Officer, along with other officials as mentioned in the written report, were engaged in encouraging and promoting the people of Piru Panchayat to construct the toilet and avoid attending call of nature in open, Yogendra Yadav became aggressive and started abusing the informant and his team members and assaulted them. It is further alleged that on call of Yogendra Yadav, petitioner and other accused persons as named

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9 of 2018 (3) dt.13-02-2018 2/2 in the written report along with 10-15 unknown armed with lathi, danda came and assaulted the informant and his team members, causing injury to them in different parts of the body as mentioned in the written report.

Case diary has been received.

Learned A.P.P. has submitted that the injury report of the injured are mentioned in paragraphs-44 to 49 of the case diary which shows that five Government Officials have been assaulted and they have sustained injuries.

Therefore, this Court does not find it a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner stands rejected.

Petitioner may surrender and make prayer for regular bail.

(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T