Ghyanshyam Purohit @ Ghanshyam Purohit @ Ghansham Prohit v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2608 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-596 Year-2017 Thana- BIHTA District- Patna ====================================================== GHYANSHYAM PUROHIT @ GHANSHYAM PUROHIT @ GHANSHAM PROHIT, son of Baldeo Das Purohit, Resident of 7/1Tagore Castle Street P.SBeadan Street, Kolkata, West Bengal-700006 (Owner of Kobelco SK 210HDLC8 Serial No. Y-12-B 2932 Green color) Sl. No.-4 in FIR ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md. Helal Ahmad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bharat Lal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 22-01-2019 Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 596 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379, 201 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation as per FIR is that 23 Poklen machines were seized, including of the petitioner and thereafter out of that 13 Poklen machines were found missing from the place of occurrence and petitioner was suspected for the same. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that nothing has been recovered from his possession and he has no hand in removing the machines.

Heard learned APP also, who has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2608 of 2019(2) dt.22-01-2019 2/2 Having heard both sides and in the facts and circumstances, as stated above, this application is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to surrender and make prayer for bail, which will be considered on the basis of materials available on record, without being prejudiced by this order. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U T