Akbar Ali @ Akbar Ansari @ Md. Akbar Ali v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58687 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-322 Year-2024 Thana- DHAKA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Akbar Ali @ Akbar Ansari @ Md. Akbar Ali S/o Late Islam Ansari R/o Village- Jamua, P.S.- Dhaka, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shahid Jawed For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anuj Kumar Shrivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 08-09-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2),190,115(2),109,352,351(2) of the B.N.S.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of one case and informant alleges that petitioner assaulted him and his son by an iron rod causing injury on their head.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that petitioner and the informant are related and are having dispute relating to passage. It is also submitted that the injury suffered by the injured has been opined to be simple in nature as would manifest from Annexure-2 to the anticipatory bail

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58687 of 2025(2) dt.08-09-2025 2/2 application. It is further submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting, then the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature, which amply demonstrates that petitioner never had intention of committing a serious occurrence. It is also submitted that petitioners will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove his innocence.

5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposes the anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Sikrahana at Dhaka, East Champaran in connection with Dhaka P. S. Case No.322 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T