Raj Kishore Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Letters Patent Appeal No.973 of 2014 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1862 of 2014 ===========================================================
1. Raj Kishore Kumar son of Shri Sikandar Yadav resident of village - Tengraha, P.O. & P.S. Bithan, District - Samastipur .... .... Appellant/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Bihar Combined Entrance Competitive Examination Board, IAS Association Building, Near Patna Airport, Patna 14 through its President
3. The Secretary, Bihar Combined Entrance Competitive Examination Board, IAS Association Building, Near Patna Airport, Patna 14
4. The Examination Controller, Bihar Combined Entrance Competitive Examination Board, IAS Association Building, Near Patna Airport, Patna 14
5. The Special Officer on Duty, Bihar Combined Entrance Competitive Examination Board, IAS Association Building, Near Patna Airport, Patna 14
6. The Principal, Government Polytechnic, Gulzarbagh, Patna - 7 .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Bindhyachal Singh Mr Manish Prakash For the State : Mr. Kritya Nand Jha, Ac to GP 11 For Respondents 2 to 5 : Mr Vikas Kumar =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) Date: 06-04-2017 Heard counsel for the appellant and counsels for the respondents.
If the learned Single Judge had himself called for the original admit card in relation to the matriculation examination, original registration card, admit card of the Intermediate examination and the admit card issued by the Board and after perusal of the
Patna High Court LPA No.973 of 2014 dt.06-04-2017 2/2 photographs and the documents coupled with the fact that the handwriting and sample etc. were sent to the Forensic Science Laboratory for verification, who have come out with a categorical finding of variation and, therefore, case of impersonation was established and made out was found to be correct. Despite opportunity, nothing tangible in terms of the satisfactory explanation was offered. The reason for dismissal of the writ application, therefore, does not suffer from any infirmity. Appeal has no merit. It is dismissed.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) (Nilu Agrawal, J) sk AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 07.4.2017 Transmission Date NA