Ram Vinay Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16973 of 2019 ====================================================== Ram Vinay Singh Son of Late Laxmi Kant Singh Resident of villageMangalpur Patani, Police Station- Ramgarhwa, District- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Accountant General Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate District- East Champaran, Motihari. 4.

The District Panchayati Raj Officer District- East Champaran, Motihari. 5.

The District Provident Fund Officer District - East Champaran, Motihari. 6.

The Block Development Officer Block Office, Harsidhi, District- East Champaran, Motihari.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Archana Meenakhsee (Gp6) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 11-09-2020 As of now, the Courts have not resumed normal physical hearing. The matter has been listed today for consideration through Video Conferencing.

Learned counsel are appearing and making submissions from their residence. The Court master and Secretary are also part of this virtual Court proceedings with the aid of audio visual technology.

Learned counsel for the State submits that on 03.01.2020, the necessary orders authorizing payments of Pension and Gratuity has been issued in favour of the petitioner. This is the

Patna High Court CWJC No.16973 of 2019(5) dt.11-09-2020 2/2 submission of the petitioner's counsel as per averments made in paragraph no-10 of the rejoinder. He, however, submits that actual payments have not been made till date. This Court, therefore, does not consider it appropriate to keep the matter pending. The same is disposed off with direction to the Authorities to ensure payments of the dues and admissible amounts in terms of the Authorization, expeditiously and preferably, within a period of eight (08) weeks, from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order.

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the certificate proceedings instituted against the petitioner as well as the criminal proceedings purported to be launched against the petitioner in terms of Annexure D and E to the counter affidavit. Authorities would be free to proceed in accordance with law.

The writ petition stands disposed off.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) shyambihari/- U