Sachitanand Sharma v. The Union Of India And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9072 of 2014 ======================================================
1. Sachitanand Sharma son of Sri Shambhu Prasad Sharma Resident of Barbatta, Dak Bangala Road, P.O. Sonepur, District - Saran .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The Union of India through the Commissioner of Income Tax - 1, Central Revenue Building, Patna
2. The Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax ( HQ ) Admn, Office of the Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Revenue Building, Patna
3. The Director of Income Tax ( Investigation ) C.R. Building, Bir Chand Patel Marg, Patna
4. The Income Tax Officer ( Hqrs ) Admn, C.R. Building, Bir Chand Patel Marg, Patna
5. The Income Tax Assessment Officer, Ward - Vaishali
6. The General Manager, Telecom District - Muzaffarpur
7. The T.D.M., B.S.N.L., Hajipur
8. Ramashray Sharma S/o Sri Anandi Sharma Resident of Laxavi Nagar, P.S. Nagar Hajipur, District - Vaishali .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajendra Kumar Jain For the Respondent/s : Mr. Renuka Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 25-10-2016 After having heard Mr. Jain, Counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Sharma for the respondent B.S.N.L., I am inclined to dispose of the application permitting the petitioner to ventilate his grievance before the competent authority of the Income Tax Department. It is stated that some representation has already been filed.
Be that as it may, if the petitioner files a fresh representation, the same shall be considered and disposed of at the hands of the appropriate/competent authority of the Income Tax
Patna High Court CWJC No.9072 of 2014 (2) dt.25-10-2016 2/2 Department in accordance with law expeditiously. Let it be noted that this Court has not gone into the merit of the claim of the petitioner.
(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) Pankaj/- U