← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/6793/2016dismiss for nonprosecution

Nagendra Sahani v. The North Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd. And ORS

2024-04-09Justice Smt. G. Anupama Chakravarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6793 of 2016 ====================================================== Nagendra Sahani Son of Raj Narayan Sahani, R/o Village - Rasulpur Salim, P.O. - Bhikhanpur, P.S. - Ahiapur, District - Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The North Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd. and Ors 2.

The General Manager, North Bihar Power Holding Company Ltd., Patna. 3.

The Superintending Engineer, Electric Supply Division, North Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd., 4.

The Executive Engineer, North Bihar Power Distribution Company ltd., Muzaffarpur.

5.

Muzaffarpur Vidyut Vitran Ltd., Distribution Franchisee of NBPDCL, Maripur Muzaffarpur through its 6.

The In - Charge cum Executive Officer, Muzaffarpur Vidyut Vitran Ltd., Distribution Franchisee of N ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Vinay Kirti Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY ORAL ORDER 09-04-2024 No representation on behalf of the petitioner.

2. The matter has come up for hearing since 27.07.2023, on the said day at the request of the petitioner, it was directed to post this matter on 04th September, 2023. Further the matter appeared on 19.09.2023, but there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and further the Court directed to list this case on 15.10.2023, but the matter was taken up on 15.03.2024. On the said day also there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and, therefore, as a last

Patna High Court CWJC No. 6793 of 2016(6) dt.09-04-2024 2/2 indulgence for hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter was directed to be posted on 18.03.2024, with condition that no further adjournment shall be granted.

3. Therefore, this Court is of the considerable view that the petitioner has no interest to evince with the matter.

4. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed for default.

(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J) manishkumar/- U