Pappu Sada @ Anil Sada v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59291 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-11 Year-2025 Thana- Darhar District- Saharsa ====================================================== Pappu Sada @ Anil Sada S/o Ganga Ram Sada @ Ganga Sada Resident of village- Devka, Post- Hati, P.S.- Nauhatta (Darhar) Hati, Distt.- Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Subesh Sharma, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-09-2025 Heard Mr. Subesh Sharma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-A), 25(1-AA), 25(1-B), 25(1-B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. As per prosecution case, on raid, one Bikash Kumar was apprehended and from his possession, several half made country made pistols, live cartridges and other materials for manufacturing of arms and ammunition were recovered. During interrogation, co-accused Bikash Kumar disclosed the name of this petitioner.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59291 of 2025(2) dt.01-09-2025 2/3 behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R.. Name of petitioner transpired in this case merely on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused person. Except confessional statement, there is no material on record to show the complicity of this petitioner in the alleged occurrence. No illegal arms or ammunition has been recovered from possession of this petitioner. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of accusation, fact that no incriminating article has been recovered from possession of this petitioner and clean antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Saharsa in connection with Darhar P.S. Case No. 11 of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59291 of 2025(2) dt.01-09-2025 3/3 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S..

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T