Saurav Singh @ Saurab Singh v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.62784 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2790 Year-2016 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== Saurav Singh @ Saurab Singh S/o Late Ashok Singh, R/o B/178, P.C. Colony, Kankarbagh, P.S.- Kankarbagh, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Shalini Kumari Singh @ Shalini Singh, W/o Saurav Singh, R/o MohallaLohia Nagar, Mount Carmel High School, Kankarbagh, Patna 20, presently Residing at A-12, Ashiyana Nagar-1, P.S.- Rajeev Nagar, District- Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Vagisha Pragya Vacaknavi , Adv.

For the State :

Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party No.2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 498A, 306, 323, 504, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, but cognizance has been taken under Sections 498A of the I.P.C. and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.62784 of 2017(2) dt.05-01-2018 2/2 present case due to petty family dispute. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State and learned counsel for the opposite party No.2, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Patna in connection with Complaint case No.2790C of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T