Santosh Kumar @ Santosh Rai v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.16970 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -184 Year- 2005 Thana -SONEPUR District- SARAN ====================================================== Santosh Kumar @ Santosh Rai son of Rang Lal Rai, resident of VillageBadurahi, P.S.- Sonepur, District- Saran .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance:
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Najmul Hoda, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashraf Ansari, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 13-05-2016 Heard both sides.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case under Sections 304B and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is the husband and the informant alleged that the petitioner and others killed his daughter within three years of her marriage. It is submitted that the victim died on 23.12.2004 but the complaint was filed on 29.07.2005. The police, after investigation, submitted final form but the learned court below took cognizance differing with the finding of the police. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and his mother Deomani Devi was rejected vide order dated 01.05.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 49327/2008. It is further submitted that Deomani Devi again moved for anticipatory bail but her anticipatory bail petition was dismissed vide order dated 12.04.2016 passed in Cr.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16970 of 2016 (2) dt.13-05-2016 2/2 Misc No. 15136/2016.
It appears that the petitioner, after rejection of his anticipatory bail petition, did not surrender in the court below for last seven years.
Considering the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in Sonepur P.S. Case No. 184 of 2015, U.T. No. 145 of 2015. Accordingly, the same is rejected.
If the petitioner surrenders in the court below, the court below shall consider the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order. (Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) Dilip/- U T