Abhiraj Kr. Yadav @ Abhiraj Kumar Yadav @ Abhiraj @ Jagga v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60894 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-383 Year-2022 Thana- KHAJANCHI HAT District- Purnia ====================================================== Abhiraj Kr. Yadav @ Abhiraj Kumar Yadav @ Abhiraj @ Jagga Son Of Pramod Yadav R/V- Professor Colony Naugachhia, Ward No. 12, P.SNaugachhia, Dist- Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amrendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Syed Ehteshamuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 20-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in connection with K.Hat (Maranga) P.S. Case No. 383 of 2022 registered under sections 461, 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

Prosecution case relates to theft in the two different shops in which from the first shop, one mobile, some electronic equipment along with Rs. 4700/- and from the other shop,some general items and Rs.2700/- were missing.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case due to personal grudge. It is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60894 of 2022(2) dt.20-02-2023 2/2 further submitted that the petitioner is not named in F.I.R. rather his name came into light in this case on the basis of confessional statement of other co-accused person, namely, Chandan Kumar. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and also he has not been put on T.I.P. He is languishing in judicial custody since 22.04.2022. The application for bail is vehemently opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with K.Hat (Maranga) P.S. Case No. 383 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Purnia.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) shubham/- U T