Lalo Yadav v. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Vigilance Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1321 of 2015 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-60 Year-2015 Thana- C.B.I CASE District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Lalo Yadav son of Rambahadur Yadav, Resident of village- Sudhraine, TolaBaghmara, P.S. Kusheshwar Asthan, District- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Vigilance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

2. The Director General Vigilance, Bihar, Patna

3. The Additional Director General Vigilance, Bihar, Patna

4. Inspector General, Special (Vigilance), Bihar, Patna

5. Superintendent of Police, Vigilance, Patna, Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Girish Chandra Jha For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Ramakant Sharma(L.O.,I/C Vig.) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 27-07-2018 Present writ application has been filed in the year 2015 for commanding the respondent authorities for expeditious and proper investigation in Complaint Case No. 60 of 2015 which is pending in the Court of Special Judge, Vigilance, North Bihar, Muzaffarpur and/or any other relief or reliefs to which the petitioner may be found entitled in course of hearing of this writ petition.

This Court has published notice in the daily cause list requesting the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State to come prepared in the old cases with information as to the present position of investigation and proceeding before the court below.

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.1321 of 2015(3) dt.27-07-2018 2/2 Learned counsel representing the State is present and submits that since final report has already been submitted in the present case during the pendency of the writ application, the relief prayed in the present writ application has become infructuous.

In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the State, the writ application is disposed of as having become infructuous.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) avin/- U T