Lalwati Devi And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.62363 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -27 Year- 2017 Thana -JURAWNPUR District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================
1. Lalwati Devi wife of Mahendra Rai
2. Mahendra Rai son of Pradeep Rai
3. Rakesh Rai son of Mahendra Rai
4. Bijali Rai son of Mahendra Rai All are residents of village Veerpur, P.S. Jurawanpur, District Vaishali.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumari Sujata Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 08-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in Jurawanpur P.S. Case No. 27 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 304, 201/34 of the IPC.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that he is not pressing the anticipatory bail petition against petitioner no. 3, who is the husband of the deceased and the same is dismissed as not pressed.
The petitioner nos. 1,2, and 4 are the family members of the husband of the deceased.
From the written report, it appears that there is general and omnibus allegation leveled against them.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.62363 of 2017 (4) dt.08-02-2018 2/2 In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner nos. 1,2 and 4, named above, in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Jurawanpur P.S. Case No. 27 of 2017, to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VIII, Hajipur at Vaishali, subject to condition as laid down u/S 438 (2) of the Cr. P.C.
with further conditions (bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every dated fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bonds of the petitioners and (3) if the petitioners tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.