Patna High CourtCWJC/20407/2011disposed

Ashok Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-10-26Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.20407 of 2011 dt.26-10-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20407 of 2011 =========================================================== Ashok Kumar Son Of Sri Hira Lal Mahto Resident Of Village-Dharam Raj, P.S. + Block-Bhagwanpur Hat, Panchayat-Bilaspur, District-Siwan. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through The Secretary, Rural Development Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna.

2. The District Magistrate, Siwan.

3. The Deputy Development Cmmissioner, Siwan.

4. The Block Development Officer, Bhagwanpur Hat Block, District-Siwan.

5. The Officer-In-Charge, Bhagwanpur Hat Police Station, District-Siwan. .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Ravindra Nath Dubey, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Ac to AAG-6 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 26-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the letter/memo no. 984 dated 11.07.2011 issued under the signature of respondent no. 4 by which the petitioner was directed to deposit the amount showing in the letter within three days.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the Enquiry Commission headed by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Udai Sinha (Retired) has now submitted its report and any further action in relation to recovery of the value of undistributed rice under the SGRY

Patna High Court CWJC No.20407 of 2011 dt.26-10-2018 Scheme would abide by the decision of the State Government to be taken on the basis of such report.

4. In the above view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach this Court afresh as and when the occasion arises in future.

5. Having regard to the stand of the petitioner, the writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.

6. Let the authorities refrain from taking coercive measures against the petitioner until decision is taken by the State Government, as aforesaid.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/BT AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 29.10.2018 Transmission Date N.A.