Hare Ram @ Lala v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57861 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2025 Thana- KHIRI MORE District- Patna ====================================================== Hare Ram @ Lala S/o Ramakant Sharma R/o Village- Khanpura, P.S.- Khiri More, District- Patna (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Mani Lal Mahto For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ram Sumiran Rai ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 04-09-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 3(5) of the B.N.S.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that his uncle is differently abled and is in habit of uttering words. Further, on 09.04.2025, the accused Hare Ram (petitioner) hearing the uttering of his uncle assaulted him by sharp edged weapon and iron rod causing injury on hand and leg.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that everyone in the village is aware about the uncle of the informant. It is next submitted that petitioner merely objected what the uncle of the informant uttered on which informant started abusing the petitioner, as such, an
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57861 of 2025(2) dt.04-09-2025 2/2 altercation took place in which both sides assaulted each other. It is also submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting, then petitioner is not alleged to have assaulted on vital part of body of the injured.
5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and also taking into consideration the fact that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Kumar Shubham, the learned J.M., 1st Class, Danapur, Patna in connection with Khiri More P. S. Case No.86 of 2025, G.R. No.2563 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T