Mithun Kumar v. The Union Of India And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18828 of 2017 =========================================================== Mithun Kumar, S/o Sri Jay Prakash Yadav, At & P.O.- Chandaur, Via- Sour Bazar, District- Saharsa.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The Union of India through the Chief Postmaster General, Bihar Circle, Patna.
2. The Postmaster General, Northern Region, Muzaffarpur.
3. The Asstt. Director- III, O/o The Postmaster, Northern Region, Muzaffarpur.
4. The Superintendent of Post Offices, Saharsa Division, Saharsa.
5. The Asstt. Superintendent of Post Offices, Madhepura Sub Division, Madhepura. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hemant Kumar Karan, Adv. Mr. Jayant Kr. Karan, Adv.
For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.D. Sanjay, Addl. S.G. Mr. Anjani Kumar Sharan, A.S.G.
=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) Date: 11-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Solicitor General for the Union of India. The core issue is that the so called certificate akin to matriculation obtained by this petitioner from the Board of Higher Secondary Education, New Delhi (a fake organization) can form the basis for begetting employment in the Postal Department. Since this is not an educational institution but a fraudulent organization selling fake certificates, therefore, if this fact is not disputed and the educational qualification of the present petitioner is not a matter of
Patna High Court CWJC No.18828 of 2017 dt.11-01-2018 2/2 argument then any employment obtained by him on the basis of the said certificate cannot beget him the benefit of continuance in service. The Court will advise the petitioner to acquire knowledge instead of buying knowledge from such institutions.
No interference is warranted with the order of the Tribunal. Writ is dismissed.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) (Nilu Agrawal, J) Rajesh/Devendra AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date15.01.2018 Transmission Date NA