Shiv Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.3127 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-60 Year-2017 Thana- ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictRohtas ====================================================== Shiv Kumar, Son of Ram Sigasan Singh alias Sigasan Singh, Resident of Village- Mahadevan Bigha, P.S.- Dehri, District- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Sarswati Devi, Wife of Shiv Kumar and Daughter of Raja Ram Singh, Resident of Village- Dhani Bigha, P.O.- Shankarpur Badihan, P.S.- Indrapuri, District- Rohtas.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rajani Kant Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. RAMCHANDRA SAHANI ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3127 of 2018(2) dt.17-01-2018 2/2 of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint case.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Dehri, District Rohtas in connection with Complaint case No.60 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T