Ranjan Yadav @ Ranjan Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2204 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -234 Year- 2016 Thana -KATORIA District- BANKA ====================================================== Ranjan Yadav @ Ranjan Kumar Yadav, S/o Chatargun Yadav, R/o VillageTindobha, P.S.- Katoria, District- Banka. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Brij Nandad Prasad, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pawan Kumar Chaurasiya, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 13-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Katoria P.S. Case No. 234 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Sections 376 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is alleged in the written report that this petitioner caught hold the hands of the informant and some unknown boy committed rape with her.

The victim girl in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr. P.C. has specifically stated that this petitioner did not commit rape with her.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2204 of 2018 (3) dt.13-02-2018 2/2 six weeks from today, in connection with Katoria P.S. Case No. 234 of 2016, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-1st, Banka, , subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and their absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T