Patna High CourtCR. MISC./63621/2025bail granted

Syed Tabrez Alam @ Syed Tabrez @ Tabrez v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-16Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63621 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-578 Year-2024 Thana- SUGAULI District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Syed Tabrez Alam @ Syed Tabrez @ Tabrez Son of Saiyad Tajarudin R/o Bhargava Tola, Ward No.- 12, Karuaini, P.S.- Sugauli, District - East Champaran 2.

Angoori Khatoon Wife of Syed Tabrej @ Syed Tabrez @ Tabrez @ Syed Tabrez Alam R/o Bhargava Tola, Ward No.- 12, Karuaini, P.S.- Sugauli, District - East Champaran 3.

Motiur Rahman @ Monu Alam Son of Syed Tabrej @ Syed Tabrez @ Tabrez @ Syed Tabrez Alam R/o Bhargava Tola, Ward No.- 12, Karuaini, P.S.- Sugauli, District - East Champaran 4.

Avish Alam Son of Syed Tabrej @ Syed Tabrez @ Tabrez @ Syed Tabrez Alam R/o Bhargava Tola, Ward No.- 12, Karuaini, P.S.- Sugauli, District - East Champaran 5.

Reyan Alam Son of Syed Tabrej @ Syed Tabrez @ Tabrez @ Syed Tabrez Alam R/o Bhargava Tola, Ward No.- 12, Karuaini, P.S.- Sugauli, District - East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Patanjali Rishi For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajendra Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case, registered for the offence under Section 80, 61 of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. As per prosecution case, daughter of informant was married in the year 2024 and after the marriage, she was

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63621 of 2025(2) dt.16-09-2025 2/2 subjected to cruelty and harassment by the accused persons for dowry and ultimately, on 31.12.2024, she was killed.

4. Petitioners are in-laws members of the deceased. There is general and omnibus allegation. Thrust of the accusation is against husband of the deceased, who is already in custody, as stated in paragraph - 8 of the bail petition. Petitioners are separate in mess and property and have got no concern with the family affairs of deceased and her husband.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Motihari (East Champaran) in connection with Sugauli P.S. Case No. 578 of 2024 , subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 of the B.N.S.S., 2023. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay/- U T