Jamila @ Jamila Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59905 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-333 Year-2022 Thana- MADHAURAH District- Saran ====================================================== 1.
Jamila @ Jamila Khatoon Wife of Jai Prakash Prasad Resident of village - Salimapur, P.S.- Madhaura (Gaura O.P.), District - Saran. 2.
Salma Nisha Wife of Younus Mohammad Resident of Village - Salimapur, P.S.- Madhaura (Gaura O.P.), District - Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners :
Mr. Danish Raja, Advocate For the State :
Ms. Sucheta Yadav, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-11-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 366A of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that on 23.05.2022, daughter of informant went to attend call of nature but did not return. Informant believes that some unknown persons kidnapped her daughter.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59905 of 2025(3) dt.10-11-2025 2/2 has falsely been implicated in this case due to village politics. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.
5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. with specific accusation that the victim in her statement recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. has supported the prosecution case and has also named this petitioner.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, gravity of offence and statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C., the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T