Dr. Bimla Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2193 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 14860 of 2012 ====================================================== Dr. Bimla Prasad Singh son of Late Sri Narayan Singh, Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics, B.R.M. College, Munger, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur. Presently residing At Azad Nagar, New Purab Sarai, Police Station- Kotwali, District- Munger .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Sri Anjani Kumar Sinha, son of not known to the petitioner, Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department(Higher Education), Government of Bihar, Patna

3. Sri Dr. Rama Shankar Dubey, son of not known to the petitioner, ViceChancellor, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur

4. Sri Md. Sahiv Hussain Rizvi son of not known to the petitioner, Registrar, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur

5. Sri Birendra Kr. Verma, son of not known to the petitioner, Finance Officer, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur.

6. Sri Amit Khare, son of not known to the petitioner, Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of India, New Delhi .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the University : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Kumar Manish, S.C.5 Mr. Kumar Pankaj, AC to SC-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 23-02-2018 Having considered the show cause filed by the University and on a perusal of the rejoinder affidavit filed by the petitioner, it is clear that the petitioner is disputing the quantification of the arrears paid at Rs.11,48,274/-. The respondents have calculated the arrears as per their pay-fixation and in the absence of there being any specific direction with

Patna High Court MJC No.2193 of 2014 (9) dt.23-02-2018 2/2 regard to the amount to be paid, the dispute now with regard to calculation of arrears will not be looked into in this contempt proceedings. The second ground raised in the rejoinder is that the petitioner has not been paid two increments for having acquired the Ph.D. degree and the same has been denied by the respondents. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to ventilate any further grievance, if subsisting, in accordance with law in an appropriate proceedings.

With the aforesaid, this application is disposed of. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) K.C.jha/- U