Mithila Mithilesh Sanskrit Prathmik Sah Uchcha Vidayalaya v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13758 of 2013 =========================================================== Mithila Mithilesh Sanskrit Prathmik Sah Uchcha Vidayalaya, Jalwar, P.O. Kamrauli, P.S. Simari, District Darbhanga through its Headmaster, Shri Shiv Narayan Thakur, son of Late Tapeshwar Thakur, resident of Village Jalwar, P.S. Simari, District- Darbhanga .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary (Secondary Education) Department of Education, Bihar, Patna
2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna
3. The Special Director (Sanskrit), Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna
4. Sri Raj Mukul, son of not known to the Petitioner, at present posted as Special Director (Sanskrit), Department of Education ,Government of Bihar, Patna
5. Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, East Boring Canal Road, Patna through its Chairman Dr. Ram Deo Prasad
6. The Chairman, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, East Boring Canal Road, Patna
7. The Secretary, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, East Boring Canal Road, Patna .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. DURGA NAND JHA For the State : Mr. KUNDAN BHADUR SINGH, SC 22 For the Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board : Mr. Shashank Shekhar Jha Mr. S. S. Sundaram =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 18-01-2016 After having heard counsel for the petitioner, counsel for the State as well as Sanskrit Shiksha Board, a modicum of inputs with regard to facilities and infrastructure of the institution in question has emerged from the report of the District Magistrate, a copy of which has also been handed over to the counsel for the petitioner. He has now tried to supplement the additional facilities as well as infrastructure which, according to the petitioner, were omitted in the report. Writ application is disposed of now with a direction both upon the Secretary of the Sanskrit Shiksha Board as well as the Special Director that
Patna High Court CWJC No.13758 of 2013 dt.18-01-2016 whatever physical verification with regard to the statement made by the petitioner in the writ application as well as the supplementary affidavit cum reply, filed and served today, would be verified by an authority and a decision taken within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this order. The previous decision in this regard to that extent would lose its effect in view of the direction issued.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) R.K.Pathak/- U