Shankar Sharma v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11477 of 2014 =========================================================== Shankar Sharma, S/o Ram Subhag Mistry, Resident of Village- Belav, P.O. Belawan, P.S. Sickaraul, District - Buxar.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Magistrate, Buxar.

4. The Superintendent of Police, Buxar.

5. The Circle Officer, Dumraon Block, Buxar.

6. The Officer-in-charge, Siraul P.S., Buxar.

7. Jalandhar Kamkar S/o Late Sukhdev Kamkar, Resident of Village Balav, P.O. Belawan, P.S. Sickraul, District Buxar.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashwini Kumar Rai, Adv. For the Res. - State : Mr. Jitendra Kumar, AC to AAG-14 For Res. No. 7 : Mr. Shivendra Kumar Sinha, Adv.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 21-07-2017 Heard Mr. Ashwini Kumar Rai, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. Shivendra Kumar Sinha, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent No.7 and learned AC to AAG-4, appearing on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 to 6. The present writ application has been filed for a direction to the respondent authorities to restrain the private respondent No.7 from encroaching the land, pertaining to C.S. Khata No. 200, Plot No.680, measuring an area 2 decimals, situated at Mauza - Belaon,

Patna High Court CWJC No.11477 of 2014 dt.21-07-2017 2/2 District -Buxar, which is being used as Aam Rasta and the same has been recorded in the C.S. record as 'Anabad Sarv Sadharan. It is submitted by learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-State that after filing of the writ application, the encroachment has been removed which gets reflected from AnnexureA series to the counter affidavit, filed on behalf of Respondents. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has not controverted the submission made by learned Counsel for the respondents. In the circumstances, the writ application has become infructuous.

Accordingly, the writ application is disposed of as having become infructuous.

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Ashwini/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date