Paras Shah @ Paras Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58984 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-53 Year-2022 Thana- BATHNAHA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== PARAS SHAH @ PARAS SAH SON OF SAGAR SAH R/O VILLAGEYAMUNA BARAHI, P.S.- BATHNAHA, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI (BIHAR) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Uday Kumar,Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Umanath Mishra, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 22-12-2022 Heard the parties.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for offence punishable u/s 341, 323, 307, 354, 504, 325, 34 of the IPC.

Allegedly, the accused persons named in F.I.R. including the petitioner abused the informant. They entered her shop and outraged her modesty and committed 'loot-pat' in her shop. Petitioner is said to have given iron rod blow to informant's husband and snatched informant's golden chain. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58984 of 2022(2) dt.22-12-2022 2/2 taken place. The specific allegation against the petitioner is that he thrown the informant on ground after holding her hair and taken away golden chain from her neck and the allegation of theft is not followed by any recovery. There is case and counter case between the parties. The present case is nothing but the counter blast to the case lodged by the petitioner. The allegation against the petitioner is that he assaulted the informant's husband with iron rod and the injuries are grievous in nature. Petitioner has no criminal antecedents.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail and submits that there is specific overt act against the petitioner. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since the injuries are grievous in nature, I am not inclined to enlarge him on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on his behalf is hereby rejected.

This application is accordingly dismissed.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T