← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4410/2019disposed

Arvind Kumar Singh And ANR v. The General Manager And ORS

2022-10-11The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4410 of 2019 ====================================================== 1.

Arvind Kumar Singh, Son of Late Vaidyanath Singh, Resident of VillageBheja, (Tola Nandanpur), P.S. Bheja Madhepur, District- Madhubani. 2.

Neeraj Kumar Singh, Son of Late Vaidyanath Singh, resident of VillageBheja (Tola Nandanpur), P.S. Bheja Madhepur, District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The General Manager Central Bank of India.

2.

The Regional Manager Central Bank of India East Central Zone, Patna. 3.

The Branch Manager Central Bank of India, Rahna, Songram, Branch Madhubani.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gagandeo Yadav, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha, Sr. Advocate Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 11-10-2022 Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):- "1. That this application for issuance of an appropriate writ/s for quashing the notice dated 24.08.2018 and 20.11.2018 issued by the respondents under section 13 (2) of the securitization and Re-Construction of Financial Assests and Enforcement of Security Interest Act 2002 whereby and whereunder Petitioner has been directed to deposit Rs. 4,13,399.00 though Rs. 15,000/- per month has been deducted from the pension account of his father till 18.06.2018 and to grant any other consequential benefits for which petitioner may found entitled in accordance with law."

Patna High Court CWJC No.4410 of 2019(3) dt.11-10-2022 2/2 In view of the fact that Debts Recovery Tribunal and Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal are now functional, learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to take recourse to such other appropriate remedies, as are otherwise available, in accordance with law.

Permission granted.

As and when any such request is made by the petitioner before the Tribunal, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously.

The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

Interlocutory application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Partha Sarthy, J) K.C.Jha/-DKS U