Raj Kumar Saw v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60335 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-34 Year-2017 Thana- LAXMIPUR District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.

Raj Kumar Saw Son of Baudhi Saw Resident of Village- Amarwa, PsLaxmipur, Dist- Jamui 2.

Devnandan Kumar Saw @ Devnandan Kumar @ Devan saw son of Baudhi Saw Resident of Village- Amarwa, Ps- Laxmipur, Dist- Jamui 3.

Mahesh Saw son of Baudhi Saw Resident of Village- Amarwa, PsLaxmipur, Dist- Jamui 4.

Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Sah son of Mahesh Sah Resident of VillageAmarwa, Ps- Laxmipur, Dist- Jamui 5.

Mantu Kumar Saw @ Mantu Saw Son of Baudhi Saw Resident of VillageAmarwa, Ps- Laxmipur, Dist- Jamui 6.

Krishna Deo Saw @ Chhotil Saw son of Baudhi Saw Resident of VillageAmarwa, Ps- Laxmipur, Dist- Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pankaj Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bharat Lal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307/34 of the I.P.C.

3. As per the prosecution case, alleged incident occurred because of dispute over grazing the field of petitioner No.3 by the sheep of the informant. It is alleged that all the F.I.R. named accused persons assaulted the informant.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60335 of 2025(2) dt.08-09-2025 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a dispute over grazing the field by sheep led to marpeet in which petitioners are alleged to have assaulted the informant. Allegation is general and omnibus. No specific overt act has been alleged against the petitioners. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition.

6. Considering the general and omnibus accusation, nature of injury and clean antecedent, let the above named petitioners, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bailbond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jamui, in connection with Laxmipur P.S. Case No. 34 of 2017 (G.R. No. 442/2017), subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) K.C.Jha/- U T