Tauhid Ansari@Md Tohid Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70906 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-52 Year-2021 Thana- BHAGALPUR KOTWALI DistrictBhagalpur ====================================================== TAUHID ANSARI@MD TOHID ANSARI Son of Masir Ansari Resident of Village - Kailashi, P.S.- Ishipur (Barahat), Distt.- Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Anita Kumari Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Aslam Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 01-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehend his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 09.01.2021, his associate (petitioner) had altercation with him and the petitioner assaulted him with brick on his head causing injury, accordingly his brother was informed who came and took him to hospital.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR it would manifest

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70906 of 2021(3) dt.01-08-2022 2/3 that no reason or motive for the occurrence has been alleged, it is submitted that it appears that both of them were together and as such on some issue an altercation took place and the occurrence came to be committed. It is also submitted that since it is alleged that petitioner assaulted the informant with brick causing injury on head that amply demonstrates that petitioner was not carrying any arms and ammunition etc, it is further submitted that on intervention of well-wishers, the parties have entered into a compromise and they don't want to pursue the case despite injury being grievous.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the fact that compromise petition dated 05.02.2021 has been filed in the learned court below, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Kotwali (Tilkamanjhi) P.S. Case No. 52 of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70906 of 2021(3) dt.01-08-2022 3/3 2021 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438

(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Shivam/- U T