← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./69957/2021bail granted

Vicky Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-03-09Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69957 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-383 Year-2021 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== VICKY KUMAR SON OF RAJ KISHORE BHAGAT Resident of Village - Sakra Faridpur, P.S.- Sakra, Distt.- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Alok Kumar Alok, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 09-03-2022 Let the defects, as pointed out by the office, be removed within four weeks of starting of Court proceeding in physical mode in normal course.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Excise Case No.383 of 2021 PR No.56 of 2021, registered for the offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Recovery is of 25.200 liters of English Wine. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent. He has falsely been implicated in the present case only on the basis of suspicion. He

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69957 of 2021(2) dt.09-03-2022 2/3 further submits that nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner rather the recovery has been made from back side of the shop of the petitioner. He further submits that the police has implicated the petitioner in the present case only on the basis of suspicion. He further submits that during investigation nothing has come against the petitioner and the police, after investigation, submitted chargesheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 19.09.2021. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Considering the fact and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Muzaffarpur in connection with Excise Case No.383 of 2021 PR No.56 of 2021 with the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69957 of 2021(2) dt.09-03-2022 3/3

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U T