Surendra Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.57478 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -36 Year- 2017 Thana -KALYANPUR DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Surendra Thakur, S/o Late Ramavtar Thakur, R/o Medan Sirasiya, P.S.- Kalyanpur, District- East Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nagendra Upadhyay, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Naresh Ray, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 07-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 36 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 304B and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that petitioner is father-in-law of the deceased.

From the written report it appears that there is no allegation of any specific overt act against this petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 36 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57478 of 2017 (2) dt.07-12-2017 2/2 bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned,

(2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T