Patna High CourtCWJC/12197/2008dismissed

Yadubir Kamat v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-08-25Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12197 of 2008 ====================================================== Yadubir Kamat, son of Late Mukeshwar Kamat, resident of village+ P.O. Parsa, Police Station-Ghoghardiha in the district of Madhubani .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

2. The Additional Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

3. The Director, Department of Agriculture, Directorate, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

4. The Mission Director, State Horticulture Mission, Bihar under Horticulture Directorate, Department of Agriculture, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

5. The Joint Director, Agriculture, Saharsa Division, Saharsa

6. The Joint Director, Agriculture, Purnea

7. The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Kishanganj. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey Mr. Shushant Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. AC to SC-20 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 25-08-2015 Heard Sri Sunil Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AC to SC-20.

The petitioner, invoking writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has prayed for quashing of Annexures -1 and 1/1, whereby the Joint Director, Agriculture , Purnea as well as Saharsa Division were asked to conduct enquiry in relation to irregularities/illegalities committed by the petitioner during his service tenure.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CWJC No.12197 of 2008 (2) dt.25-08-2015 2/2 petitioner was earlier proceeded departmentally and the Enquiry Officer has submitted its report. However, no order was passed against the petitioner.

The Court is of the opinion that at such preliminary stage, no interference is required. The writ petition stands dismissed.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) NKS/- U