Raj Kumar Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61147 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-601 Year-2015 Thana- LAKHISARAI District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== RAJ KUMAR RAM SON OF LATE MURAL RAM RESDIENT OF VILLAGE NAWABGANJ, ALINAGAR, P.S SURAJGARHA DISTRICT LAKHISARAI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajive Ranjan Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nirmal Kumar Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 15-09-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 149, 353, 332 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation against the petitioner is to create a nuisance while raising demand to return the victim girl, who appeared before the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai for recording her statement under Section 164 of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61147 of 2023(2) dt.15-09-2023 2/3 Cr.P.C. and also to deter police officials to discharge their official functions by scuffling and also by way of pelting stones on police party.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. Petitioner is not named in the FIR. The name of the petitioner has come into light on the basis of suspicion of co-villager of the victim girl. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. He further submitted that the other co-accused has already been granted bail by a Coordinate Bench vide order dated 25.07.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 38709 of 2023. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. He is languishing in judicial custody since 21.07.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61147 of 2023(2) dt.15-09-2023 3/3 satisfaction of the learned Court below in connection with Lakhisarai P.S. Case No. 601 of 2015.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U