Shama Khatoon @ Shama Khatun v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16952 of 2019 ====================================================== Shama Khatoon @ Shama Khatun, Wife of Md. Shakil @ Md. Sakil, Resident of Village- Babubarhi, P.S.- Babubarhi, District- Madhubani. At present posted on the post of Talimi Markaz in Rajkiya Kanya Middle School, Babubarhi, P.S.- Babubarhi, District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Human Resource Development Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Director, Mass Education Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Regional Deputy Director of Education Department, Darbhanga Range Darbhanga.

4.

The District Magistrate, Madhubani.

5.

The District Education Officer, Madhubani.

6.

The District Programme Officer (Saksharta), Madhubani. 7.

The Block Education Officer, Babubarhi, Madhubani. 8.

The Headmaster, Rajkiya Kanya Middle School, Babubarhi, Madhubani. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjeev Kumar Jha For the Respondent/s :

Smt.Binita Singh (Sc28) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 21-08-2019 The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition is non-payment of remuneration.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has regularly worked as Talimi Markaz, but she has not been paid remuneration from 01.02.2014 till date. The issue of payment of remuneration requires verification of the record and as such the writ petition is of with a direction to the respondent-District Programme Officer

Patna High Court CWJC No.16952 of 2019(2) dt.21-08-2019 2/2 (Saksharta), Madhubani to verify the records to ascertain whether the petitioner has worked as Talimi Markaz or not for the period she is claiming remuneration.

In case, if it is found that the petitioner has worked for the period she is claiming remuneration, the respondents shall ensure payment of salary for the period the petitioner has actually worked.

Necessary decision in this regard must be taken by the respondents at the earliest preferably within a maximum period of 60 days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) uday/- U