← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/1131/2019disposed

Shakra Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-03-06Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1131 of 2019 ====================================================== Shakra Khatoon wife of Md. Irfan Resident of Village- Dostiya, PanchayatGurhanwa, P.S.- Kundwa Chaipur, District- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Food and Civil Supply, Govt. of Bihar.

2.

The Commissioner, Tirhut Division Muzaffarpur. 3.

The District Magistrate East Champaran at Motihari. 4.

The District Supply Officer East Champaran at Motihari. 5.

The Sub Divisional Officer Sikrahana at Dhaka, District- East Champaran 6.

The Block Development Officer Dhaka, District- East Champaran. 7.

Iffat Ara Begum wife of Md. Khurshid Alam resident of Village- Mahuawa, P.O.- Phulwariya, P.S. Dhaka, District- East Champaran. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md. Anis Akhtar For the Respondent/s :

Mr.S. Raza Ahmad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 06-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the Respondent No. 7.

After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ application with a liberty to file statutory appeal before the District Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari (Respondent No. 3). Permission is granted.

The writ application is disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

Patna High Court CWJC No.1131 of 2019(4) dt.06-03-2019 2/2 The interim order stands vacated.

In case, the appeal is preferred within a period of 30 days from today, the same shall be considered on it's own merit, and, in case, question of limitation arises, the same shall be considered keeping in mind that petitioner was pursuing his remedy before this court.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Rajeev/- U